Skip to main content

How do I know I've preached a gospel talk?


 

Which of the following is the gospel talk?

Talk 1

+ Here is what the text says
+ Here is how we must live in light of that text
+ Now go and live that way

Talk 2

+ Here is what the text says
+ Here is how we must live in light of that text
+ Now go and live that way
+ But we can’t do it on our own, we need Jesus in our life
+ Now with Jesus, by grace, enabled by the Spirit we can live rightly

Talk 3

+ Here is what the text says
+ Here is how we must live in the light of that text
+ But we simply cannot do it
+ Ah - but there is One who did!

Well Talk #1 is pretty obviously moralistic. Talk #2 looks a lot more like the gospel... But not quite. Despite all the talk of human inability, despite all the talk of Jesus and grace and God’s enabling, Talk #2 doesn’t actually give us the gospel. This is grace as a spiritual boost to help you do the right thing, not grace in the sense of the sovereign salvation of God through Christ’s death in the place of sinners.

It’s really easy to slip into a #2 style talk – especially when you’re preaching the OT Law or the Prophets or doing a topical talk. It’s an improvement on #1 in that we realise ‘hang on we can’t do this’ and we have this sense we need to talk about Jesus and grace… but it falls short of the gospel. It doesn’t give us Christ crucified. It ultimately ends up with our eternal destiny still being in the balance, depending on whether we have (with God’s help) sufficiently kept the Law.

Talk #3 gets us to the heart of the gospel, the substitution of Christ for sinners. While we deserve nothing but hell, he took all our sin on himself and stood under the terrible fiery waterfall of the wrath of God until he had made a complete satisfaction. As we look to him, hanging there on the Cross, made sin for us, we are completely forgiven. And not only that, we are clothed in his righteousness, clothed in his beautifully obedient, loving, holy life. The Great Exchange. Freedom. Our eternity completely secure. Praise God!

But there's a problem if our talk stops there. Talk #3 is much better than the first two talks but it gives me little clue on what it means to live as a believer now. The force of the exhortations and commands in the text is effectively neutered. Do this - I can't - Jesus has - Relief. But that's not how the NT authors preach the gospel to us. I think for example of one of my favourite gospel verses:

He himself bore our sins” in his body on the cross (1 Peter 2:24)

Beautiful gospel. But look how the sentence continues:

...so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness

So what we need, as Tim Keller explains very helpfully on 'Preaching in a secular culture' is something more like this:

+ Here is what the text says
+ Here is how we must live in light of it
+ But we simply cannot do it
+ Ah – but there is One who did!
+ Now, through faith in him, you can begin to live this way

And, as Keller explains and has wonderfully demonstrated in his own preaching over the years, is that last step (sanctification) flows naturally out of the one before (the Cross). It is as we look with faith at the crucified king that our desires are captured, our pride is cut down, the stranglehold of sin is broken, our worldview is turned upside down and inside out, and we see our new identity as blood-bought, beloved, children of the Father. This involves getting into the complexity of sanctification - it's not simple but it's beautiful, because it's about the end for which we were saved, it's about the purpose of the Cross, it's about the bridegroom getting a bride.

The most powerful example of this kind of preaching I've experienced was Ken Mbugua preaching through Leviticus at Emmanuel Baptist, Nairobi. Each sermon was best part of an hour and it was like being on a rollercoaster. He would start by showing us the goodness of the Law - how wonderful it would be if we lived in a society where we loved our neighbours and returned people's lost stuff and didn't have to worry about locking our doors - how beautiful and good that would be. And then he would show us how we completely fail to keep this Law - how our heart is so wrong and ugly and guilty and deserving of the wrath of God. And he'd keep going with that point till you were longing for him to move on but he'd stay there, turning the knife, pinning you to your seat. Then, when you're feeling totally convicted and hopeless he'd show us Jesus, living the beautiful Law and taking our place and dying our death and drinking the cup of wrath to the dregs. And you feel the load lifted and the joy coming. And then he wouldn't stop there but remind us of that beautiful Law that we started with, which Jesus fulfilled and which he's saved us for - the Law that's now inscribed on our hearts by the Spirit; the way of love that we walk yoked together with the One who is this holy love; the life of growing into the Head and pleasing our Bridegroom by loving our neighbours in these very specific and practical ways. 

Let’s make sure we're fully preaching the gospel that saves and transforms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Everlasting gobstopper theology

The idea here is that there are layers to Christ's fullness and when the biblical authors present Christ to us they might only explicitly refer to one layer but as they do that the underlying layers are also implied. Or to put it another way, the glory of the underlying layers shines through the layer that is presented to us. That might sound strange, abstract and not particularly helpful but let me try to explain.  The incarnation implies the pre-existent Word When John identifies "Jesus Christ has come in the flesh" as the key test of orthodoxy, Augustine asks (Homily 6 on 1 John) how can this be when so many heretics happily affirm the humanity of Jesus but deny his deity? Augustine then asks us to dig a bit deeper and consider: From whence did he come? "Was he not God?" Simon Gathercole demonstrated (in his 2006 book, The Pre-existent Son ) that Jesus' phrase in the synoptic gospels, "I have come", implies divine pre-existence.  So whenever we ...

Building a RAFT: transitioning well

From the archives - originally written 8 years ago in the midst of international family transition… When Duncan Olumbe led an excellent session for the iServe Africa ministry training course on transition , there was one thing that he mentioned but didn’t have time to go into detail on: building a RAFT. The idea of building a RAFT comes from Pollock & Van Reken's  Third Culture Kids: Growing Up Among Worlds but it’s applicable to anyone moving on, whether adults or children, expats or citizens. The basic plan is Reconciliation-Affirmation-Farewells-ThinkDestination. It’s not only practical and proven but it also fits well with the pattern and teaching of the apostle Paul, someone who certainly knew what it was to go through a lot of transitions. Reconciliation Deal with conflict before you leave. Forgive and ask for forgiveness. We can easily sweep conflict under the carpet. Particularly when we are leaving it’s very tempting not to bother dealing with unresolved issues. But...

10 things servant leadership is

Having cleared away 10 things servant leadership is not , here are 10 that it is. [Credit to Harrison Mungai for his help in observing many of these features and helping us to think through this really important area.] I used to think that all that was necessary in gospel ministry was faithful Bible handling. Preach the Word carefully and surely everything else should follow? But I was wrong. Sadly it is possible to have high quality expository preaching and ungodly leadership. It shouldn’t be possible but it is. And it’s a very ugly thing. Peter Mead has written  on the danger that can be done to a church or ministry when appointment of leaders values ability over character. So here are ten aspects of biblical servant leadership, specifically in relation to gospel ministry leadership, from 1 Thessalonians, especially chapters 2 and 3: Servant leadership is, wherever possible, Plural . A lot of articles and books on leadership assume that it is a personal project. Search G...