Skip to main content

The ancient roots of mentoring



The idea of an older person helping in the development of a younger person is an ancient pattern seen across many cultures.

In warrior societies and castes such as among the Japanese samurai and the European feudal knights there would be an 'apprenticeship' stage. Among the Maasai there are the morans - living apart from their families in the bush, learning the wisdom of the elders and strengthening themselves physically and spiritually.

The ancient pattern is that a son learns the trade of his father by being next to him, day after day, seeing everything he does, working alongside him. That was true in the harvest field (2 Kings 4:18), in trades like carpentry (Matt. 13:55), it was how the Law of Yahweh was to be passed on (Deut. 6:7), it is even seen in the relationship between the eternal Father and Son (John 5:19-20).

Harrison Mungai, founder of iServe Africa, has often pointed to the success of Asian businesses where there is often high intergenerational family commitment, continuity and stability. Behind the counter (so to speak) there is often a 70 year old patriarch or sometimes matriarch, the 40 year old son/daughter and the 10 year old child.

In Medieval Europe this form of learning was formalised in apprenticeships (usually from age 12 to 21) into a trade guild. But outside those trades most life skills and work was learnt through familial relationships until the mid nineteenth century when the industrial revolution shifted work outside the home. (It will be interesting to see how the Covid-19 UK lockdown, which has increased home working from 30% to 60% might play into intergenerational learning/working.)

The term ‘mentor’ came into English when ‎François Fénelon's Les Aventures de Télémaque were translated in the early 18th century. Fenelon uses some of Homer's setting and characters (King Odysseus, off to fight the Trojan War, has entrusted his son Telemachus to the care of a loyal old friend named Mentor) to make points about contemporary (late 17th century French) politics and education. But there are a number of ways in which Fénelon picks up on aspects of Mentor's ancient role and expands and develops them into what we now recognise as the role of a mentor. 

Someone (I can't find the reference) has noted that (via Fénelon) Mentor’s principal actions in relation to Telemachus were:
  1. Preparing him for his present and future role and inheritance
  2. Prompting him to see and correct injustice
  3. Travelling with him on adventures
  4. Helping him to understand his identity 
  5. Giving him honest feedback
  6. Suggesting options of courses of action 
  7. Making strategic introductions
  8. Assisting him to find resources for the task
  9. Reminding him of his father’s character and priorities
  10. Encouraging him that his father will return one day
What I find particularly interesting here is that mentor is in a sense a surrogate father role (cf. Phil. 2:22 - as a son with a father) and yet the role is focused not on the mentor but on spurring on Telemachus to be the true son of his  true Father and do what his Father would have him do now as he waits for a future fulness of sonship. Isn't that hugely suggestive for Christian discipleship?

Lord, in your mercy, turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers. May there be many mentors who point people to the Father through the Son, who give courage to live as children of the King, who encourage groaning for our inheritance, the resurrection day when the sons of God will be revealed in glory and we will feel your thumb wipe every tear from our eyes. Amen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 things servant leadership is

Having cleared away 10 things servant leadership is not , here are 10 that it is. [Credit to Harrison Mungai for his help in observing many of these features and helping us to think through this really important area.] I used to think that all that was necessary in gospel ministry was faithful Bible handling. Preach the Word carefully and surely everything else should follow? But I was wrong. Sadly it is possible to have high quality expository preaching and ungodly leadership. It shouldn’t be possible but it is. And it’s a very ugly thing. Peter Mead has written  on the danger that can be done to a church or ministry when appointment of leaders values ability over character. So here are ten aspects of biblical servant leadership, specifically in relation to gospel ministry leadership, from 1 Thessalonians, especially chapters 2 and 3: Servant leadership is, wherever possible, Plural . A lot of articles and books on leadership assume that it is a personal project. Search G...

Utumishi wa Neno taster

It's finally starting! We had our first taster day for the church-based Utumishi wa Neno preaching course on Saturday. It was great to spend a few hours with 14 or so brothers and sisters and just spend soak in the Word. One of the crazy things we did was to read through the whole of Philippians out loud. How long did it take us? 15 minutes. And all of us enjoyed the experience and heard things we'd never noticed before. More thoughts on the day here . And for those who asked for the notes, they're available to download here . If you're in Kenya and want to get involved in the on-going Utumishi training see more info on the iServe Africa website .

Too short a text?

I was a bit concerned recently when I found that a church I hugely respect had been going through the letter of 1 Peter for the last 7 months and were only just beginning chapter 5. It's wonderful to preach through the books and letters of the Bible. All that was said was true and helpful. But is there a danger in only taking three verses at a time? I think there is. You're likely to lose the flow of the letter. 1 Peter only takes 16 minutes (max) to read out loud. That is how the first readers would have heard it. That's how it's meant to be experienced. Certainly there's a place for more detailed study but there is a great danger we lose the flow, the themes, the life of this living letter. If you preach for 45 minutes on 3 verses you're likely to be bringing in all sorts of cross-references, lots of systematic theology. In fact the verses of 1 Peter itself are probably going to be only a small proportion of your content. So the great danger is that I...