Skip to main content

Clear: How I ought to speak


Just struck by this phrase in Paul to the Colossians - "as I ought to speak." In a passage full of surprises (Col. 2:2-4) he asks for prayer, above all things, to be clear in his preaching. And then he adds that phrase "as I ought" or "as I must" or "as it behoves me". He's not being clear because it is the most effective form of communication (though it is) or because clarity is extremely powerful and compelling (though it is) or because he doesn't have lots of long words and rhetorical skill (he does). He must be clear. Why? 
  1. Because this is not about Paul, this is about God. He has been entrusted with the gospel and his job is just to be a faithful minister of that gospel (Col. 1:23-25); to be a faithful messenger, handing on the message without distortion. He must give people the Word not himself. The pure Word.
  2. Because this is a message for hearts and minds. This is truth to understand and absorb and digest (Col. 1:5). There must be knowledge for there to be life change (Col. 1:9-10). That will require the Spirit’s work but it also demands clarity. It is not, as in some other religions, enough to hear and accept and recite words mindlessly – there must be understanding, learning.
  3. Because this is a message for all the world, Jew and Gentile, rich and poor, men and women, children and elders. The aim is that all would understand for themselves the truth that sets them free, that all would learn Christ and the fullness in him. There must be no cultural obstacle, no long word to stumble a little one. There must be clarity.
  4. Because the gospel is clear. It is not a message of grey areas and blurred lines and playful ambiguity. There are sharp edges, hard truths, dividing lines. There is heaven and hell, truth and lies, the kingdom of darkness and the kingdom of light, alienation and reconciliation (Col. 1:5, 12-13, 21). We might instinctively seek to hide in vagueness but the gospel demands loving clarity.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A prayer for the summer

LORD God, our God, the Maker of Heaven and Earth, our Father, as your children in the northern hemisphere enter this season of the academic year, please give us fresh grace to walk, stand and sit aright. May those of us who enjoy running and walking in your creation give thanks to you for that privilege but not be as concerned about the daily step count on our trackers as in taking practical steps this summer in kindness, in compassion, in forgiveness, in building others up, in pleasing the Lord - steps of progress in gracious, sacrificial, Christ-like loving (Ephesians 4-5).  May those of us who look forward to getting out of the city give thanks to you for the privilege of travel but not ultimately be as concerned about the physical location in which we stand (whether "beneath the boughs" or on a hot and sweaty tube train) as about our location "in Christ" - the address of every spiritual blessing, complete forgiveness, intimate sonship, total security (Ephesians ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Everlasting gobstopper theology

The idea here is that there are layers to Christ's fullness and when the biblical authors present Christ to us they might only explicitly refer to one layer but as they do that the underlying layers are also implied. Or to put it another way, the glory of the underlying layers shines through the layer that is presented to us. That might sound strange, abstract and not particularly helpful but let me try to explain.  The incarnation implies the pre-existent Word When John identifies "Jesus Christ has come in the flesh" as the key test of orthodoxy, Augustine asks (Homily 6 on 1 John) how can this be when so many heretics happily affirm the humanity of Jesus but deny his deity? Augustine then asks us to dig a bit deeper and consider: From whence did he come? "Was he not God?" Simon Gathercole demonstrated (in his 2006 book, The Pre-existent Son ) that Jesus' phrase in the synoptic gospels, "I have come", implies divine pre-existence.  So whenever we ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The virtue of stability

We live in a culture where stability, stick-ability and consistency are not really seen as virtues but disabilities. We told that it’s good to be flexible, agile, constantly shifting, morphing, evolving, jumping from one thing to another. Everyone offers us change – politicians, internet providers, management gurus. To stick with one thing, to be the same person yesterday, today and tomorrow is strange, boring, old-fashioned, impractical and probably deadly. Change becomes the new constant, flux and flex the new buzz words. That culture affects us personally and as churches. And there are some things about willingness to change (reformation?) that are hugely positive. We've talked about the need to be willing to change as a good farmer seeking growth . And how change is often spiritually good for us . But there are negative aspects to a culture that makes a virtue of constant instability. Is it good for customers and companies if employees change jobs every year? Is it good for chi...
Post a Comment
Read more