Skip to main content

3 John 2 - the great prosperity verse?

What does the Bible say?

We prosper physically as our soul prospers! Amen!

...actually it doesn’t say that.

  1. For starters it's a prayer not a promise. Just a simple observation of grammar and genre. It's good to pray for people's health for many things but the Father, in his wisdom, does not always give us what we pray for. Paul's thorn remained in the flesh. Trophimus remained sick in Miletus. Christians die. Even the Son of Man prayed with the qualification, "If it is possible... Yet not my will." A prayer is not promise.
  2. Another interesting observation is that prayers for health were extremely common in letters in the Roman world. The standard way to start a letter was with the opening address followed by something like, "Before all else I pray for your health and success", a wish which is sometimes expanded to a rather lengthy discussion of health matters (see the extremely helpful recent article by Peter Head in the Tyndale Bulletin available online). This makes the almost complete lack of mention of physical health in the New Testament letters, even the more personal ones, quite shocking. As Peter Head notes, instead of a concern for physical health, the NT letters are consumed with a concern for the spiritual health of the church body and use the vocabulary of 'health' and 'healing' and 'soundness' to refer to teaching and salvation rather than to the physical body. So the fact that this health/prosperity concern is conspicuously absent in the NT letters except possibly here in 3 John makes it very ironic that contemporary preachers should seize on this verse as their great theme and lens for the whole Bible.
  3. I say that the health concern is 'possibly here' in 3 John 2 because it may be that 'even as' (kathos) is linking two things where the second clause "soul prospers" clarifies the first clause "prospering and being in good health". In other words, kathos could be read as epexegetical (to use a fancy word) with the meaning “in the sense that” or “namely”. This would fit with the wider NT understanding of prosperity and health (as noted in the previous point) and it is also how many scholars understand the kathos in verse 3: Gaius is "in the truth" in the sense that he is "walking in the truth." I'm not saying we have to take it that way, it's perfectly possible that John is concerned for Gaius' physical health and well-being but it's worth keeping that possibility in mind.
  4. Most importantly, physical health and prosperity is not the big thing for John. The phrase “above all things” which appears in 3 John 2 in the KJV is dependent on little and very late textual evidence (late 16th c) for the Greek word pro. The vast majority of manuscripts have peri - “concerning all things”. Even without this, as we read on in 3 John it’s very clear that John’s biggest concern is not Gaius’ physical health but his spiritual health: "I have no greater joy than to hear my children are walking in the truth (v4). Yes bodies are important; it's good to pray for one another to be healed, but that’s not what this letter is about.
What is 3 John all about? See:


Popular posts from this blog

What to do with the Song of Songs?

There seem to be two extreme positions on interpreting the Song of Songs in our context – either it’s purely about Christ and the Church, or it is purely about human relationships. And the second of these seems to be much more common. And perhaps more common than either is a reluctance to even attempt to preach from the book. And then the other day I was reading a Christian book on marriage when the author suddenly felt the need to argue strongly at some length against the idea that the Song of Songs can be interpreted allegorically of Christ and the Church. So maybe it’s worth going through the key arguments the author made there against what is the traditional interpretation through church history that the Song is primarily to be taken as referring to the relationship between Christ and the Church. 1. The topic of the Song of Songs is obviously sex. Solomon is plainly writing about human, romantic relationships. That is his theme. Not Christ and the Church. In answer: That’s

The sluggard and the gospel ant

Fruitfulness = (A) Knowing the good + (B) Considering how to do it + (C) Doing it + (D) Divine action The actually doing it bit is important.  I always find the description of the sluggard in the book of Proverbs convicting. In particular I'm convicted that his problem is lack of implementation and fruitlessness. "The way of the sluggard is blocked with thorns…" [Prov. 15:19] He knows the way but he's not walking in it. His procrastination has allowed the thorns to build up. And the more they build up the more daunting the task of walking down that path is going to be. Sounds a lot like an email inbox.  "I went past the field of a sluggard, past the vineyard of someone who has no sense; thorns had come up everywhere, the ground was covered with weeds, and the stone wall was in ruins." [Prov 24:30-31] Thorns again. The reminder of Genesis 3. Without sweat the weeds grow. The sluggard is not actively seeking to do wrong. He's just not taking care of what

Psalm 119 podcast: mouthfuls of Bible delight

Christopher Ash's Bible Delight is a wonderfully rich, pastorally sensitive exposition of Psalm 119. Taking a section at a time he slows us down to hear the music of grace in the background of what at first listen might sound strident; slows us down to dig up beautiful gems in apparently unpromising ground; slows us down to take in the nuances and carefulness of what might at first sight seem thrown together. If you haven't got a copy, check it out - it'll do your soul good.  I recently read through Bible Delight a second (or maybe third) time and did a series of 22 little audios for my church small group. In this strange lockdown time many of us have been finding it hard to concentrate, hard to read more than a sentence, hard to pray. So this was intended as bitesize encouragement a few times a week. The format is simple: I read the section of Psalm 119 (almost always using Christopher Ash's own translation of the Hebrew); spend two or three minutes going through the