Skip to main content

3 John 2 - the great prosperity verse?


What does the Bible say?

We prosper physically as our soul prospers! Amen!

Well...
...actually it doesn’t say that.

  1. For starters it's a prayer not a promise. Just a simple observation of grammar and genre. It's good to pray for people's health for many things but the Father, in his wisdom, does not always give us what we pray for. Paul's thorn remained in the flesh. Trophimus remained sick in Miletus. Christians die. Even the Son of Man prayed with the qualification, "If it is possible... Yet not my will." A prayer is not promise.
  2. Another interesting observation is that prayers for health were extremely common in letters in the Roman world. The standard way to start a letter was with the opening address followed by something like, "Before all else I pray for your health and success", a wish which is sometimes expanded to a rather lengthy discussion of health matters (see the extremely helpful recent article by Peter Head in the Tyndale Bulletin available online). This makes the almost complete lack of mention of physical health in the New Testament letters, even the more personal ones, quite shocking. As Peter Head notes, instead of a concern for physical health, the NT letters are consumed with a concern for the spiritual health of the church body and use the vocabulary of 'health' and 'healing' and 'soundness' to refer to teaching and salvation rather than to the physical body. So the fact that this health/prosperity concern is conspicuously absent in the NT letters except possibly here in 3 John makes it very ironic that contemporary preachers should seize on this verse as their great theme and lens for the whole Bible.
  3. I say that the health concern is 'possibly here' in 3 John 2 because it may be that 'even as' (kathos) is linking two things where the second clause "soul prospers" clarifies the first clause "prospering and being in good health". In other words, kathos could be read as epexegetical (to use a fancy word) with the meaning “in the sense that” or “namely”. This would fit with the wider NT understanding of prosperity and health (as noted in the previous point) and it is also how many scholars understand the kathos in verse 3: Gaius is "in the truth" in the sense that he is "walking in the truth." I'm not saying we have to take it that way, it's perfectly possible that John is concerned for Gaius' physical health and well-being but it's worth keeping that possibility in mind.
  4. Most importantly, physical health and prosperity is not the big thing for John. The phrase “above all things” which appears in 3 John 2 in the KJV is dependent on little and very late textual evidence (late 16th c) for the Greek word pro. The vast majority of manuscripts have peri - “concerning all things”. Even without this, as we read on in 3 John it’s very clear that John’s biggest concern is not Gaius’ physical health but his spiritual health: "I have no greater joy than to hear my children are walking in the truth (v4). Yes bodies are important; it's good to pray for one another to be healed, but that’s not what this letter is about.
What is 3 John all about? See:
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

10 things servant leadership is

Having cleared away 10 things servant leadership is not , here are 10 that it is. [Credit to Harrison Mungai for his help in observing many of these features and helping us to think through this really important area.] I used to think that all that was necessary in gospel ministry was faithful Bible handling. Preach the Word carefully and surely everything else should follow? But I was wrong. Sadly it is possible to have high quality expository preaching and ungodly leadership. It shouldn’t be possible but it is. And it’s a very ugly thing. Peter Mead has written  on the danger that can be done to a church or ministry when appointment of leaders values ability over character. So here are ten aspects of biblical servant leadership, specifically in relation to gospel ministry leadership, from 1 Thessalonians, especially chapters 2 and 3: Servant leadership is, wherever possible, Plural . A lot of articles and books on leadership assume that it is a personal project. Search G...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utumishi wa Neno taster

It's finally starting! We had our first taster day for the church-based Utumishi wa Neno preaching course on Saturday. It was great to spend a few hours with 14 or so brothers and sisters and just spend soak in the Word. One of the crazy things we did was to read through the whole of Philippians out loud. How long did it take us? 15 minutes. And all of us enjoyed the experience and heard things we'd never noticed before. More thoughts on the day here . And for those who asked for the notes, they're available to download here . If you're in Kenya and want to get involved in the on-going Utumishi training see more info on the iServe Africa website .
5 comments
Read more

Too short a text?

I was a bit concerned recently when I found that a church I hugely respect had been going through the letter of 1 Peter for the last 7 months and were only just beginning chapter 5. It's wonderful to preach through the books and letters of the Bible. All that was said was true and helpful. But is there a danger in only taking three verses at a time? I think there is. You're likely to lose the flow of the letter. 1 Peter only takes 16 minutes (max) to read out loud. That is how the first readers would have heard it. That's how it's meant to be experienced. Certainly there's a place for more detailed study but there is a great danger we lose the flow, the themes, the life of this living letter. If you preach for 45 minutes on 3 verses you're likely to be bringing in all sorts of cross-references, lots of systematic theology. In fact the verses of 1 Peter itself are probably going to be only a small proportion of your content. So the great danger is that I...
1 comment
Read more