Skip to main content

The great cancer: the gospel assumed


There’s a very important article by David Gibson called ‘Assumed Evangelicalism’.  It's well worth reading the whole thing but just to whet your appetite I'll summarise...  Gibson starts by retelling the stories of two movements – the Mennonites and the UK Student Christian Movement:
The first generation of the Mennonite Brethren movement believed and proclaimed the gospel and thought that there were certain social entailments. The next generation assumed the gospel and advocated the entailments. The third generation denied the gospel and all that were left were the entailments. 
In its earliest days the SCM believed and proclaimed the atoning blood of Jesus. The next generation assumed it but did not make it central. The following generations have rejected and denied the apostolic gospel.
Gibson defines ‘assumed evangelicalism’ as a church, organisation or movement which: 
believes and signs up to the gospel. It certainly does not deny the gospel. But in terms of priorities, focus, and direction, assumed evangelicalism begins to give gradually increasing energy to concerns other than the gospel and key evangelical distinctives, to gradually elevate secondary issues to a primary level, to be increasingly worried about how it is perceived by others and to allow itself to be increasingly influenced both in content and method by the prevailing culture of the day.
It's a subtle and difficult thing to spot but Gibson gives us two helpful questions with which to examine ourselves:
  1. To what extent does scandalous and transforming grace dictate our priorities and shape our visions and strategies? If the gospel is assumed there will be legalism and/or license. We will think that the gospel is just for unbelievers not for believers. We will look for Jesus plus...
  2. To what extent do the evangelical distinctives of biblical authority and the Cross dictate our priorities, and shape our visions and strategies?  Are these truths just filed away in a dusty doctrinal basis or they the source of our joy, taught and preached week after week.
Assumed evangelicalism is rife. And the solution is getting explicit. As Glen Scrivener tweeted a few years ago:

“For every use of ‘gospel’ as adjective I want 3 explanations of the noun & if u bang on abt gospel-centred by golly u’d better centre on it”

Good point well made. So here are a few explanations to get us going: What is the gospel?
Let's be explicit about the gospel. Let's not lose our relish for the good new of Christ crucified and risen and given to us. Let's communicate it with all the different colours that the Bible paints it for us. Let's be gospel-centred in a richly biblical way. Let's keep pointing to Christ in his Word.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 things servant leadership is

Having cleared away 10 things servant leadership is not , here are 10 that it is. [Credit to Harrison Mungai for his help in observing many of these features and helping us to think through this really important area.] I used to think that all that was necessary in gospel ministry was faithful Bible handling. Preach the Word carefully and surely everything else should follow? But I was wrong. Sadly it is possible to have high quality expository preaching and ungodly leadership. It shouldn’t be possible but it is. And it’s a very ugly thing. Peter Mead has written  on the danger that can be done to a church or ministry when appointment of leaders values ability over character. So here are ten aspects of biblical servant leadership, specifically in relation to gospel ministry leadership, from 1 Thessalonians, especially chapters 2 and 3: Servant leadership is, wherever possible, Plural . A lot of articles and books on leadership assume that it is a personal project. Search G...

Faithfully present - when time flies or freezes

"So Jacob served seven years to get Rachel, but they seemed like only [literally: 'they became'] a few days to him because of his love for her." (Genesis 29:20) Robert Alter,  Genesis Translation and Commentary , on Gen 22:9-10: "In contrast to the breathless pace of the narrative as a whole, this sequence inscribes a kind of slow motion: building the altar, laying out the wood, binding... reaching out the hand..." Adam Ramsey's beautifully written  Faithfully Present is summed up well by the subtitle: "Embracing the Limits of Where and When God Has You." Big idea: God is unlimited by place and time but we are limited. Ramsey gives wisdom on what it looks like to 'make peace' with those creaturely limits, in a way that is rooted not in trendy mindfulness (and not unrealistic about the demands of real life) but is grounded in the gospel realities of creation, fall, redemption, sanctification and consummation. Highlights Ramsey's des...

Growing non-prickly

Isaiah 55:12-13 is a beautiful end to a beautiful chapter.  "For you will go out in joy     and be led forth in peace; the mountains and hills     will burst into song before you, and all the trees of the field     will clap their hands. Instead of the thornbush will grow the juniper,     and instead of briers the myrtle will grow. This will be for the Lord’s renown,     for an everlasting sign,     that will endure forever." The great call of the chapter (v1-7) is to come to the free banquet of grace, to open ears as if mouths to eat, to seek the Lord, to come to him who is the feast. And then there are three reasons given: v8-9 - this Lord is nothing like you imagined, v10-11 - His Word is coming down from heaven to earth to bring life, v12-13 - this is all for joy God's great plan is the joy project . We are heading towards eternal joy - the greater Exodus - "led forth in peace." Miriam singing and dancing on the far s...