Skip to main content

10 things expository preaching is not

  1. Just an explanation of the text - what is sometimes called in the Kenyan context a 'Bible exposititon' or 'Bible study' or what is called in some UK university CUs a 'Bible reading'. Expository preaching is not a commentary or a lecture. It's not just walking through a text explaining it. It is declaring the oracles of God, making an impassioned argument for Christ, confronting us with Christ, feeding us with Christ.
  2. A technique – It's not about applying some complex set of rules and procedures. You don't master some clever system and then get a certificate or a blackbelt. This is not rocket science - it's just opening up the Word and letting it speak for itself.
  3. A style – It's not 3 points all beginning with 'P'. It's not a quiet bookish tone of voice. It's not using lots of clever academic language. It's not standing still behind a pulpit.
  4. Always verse by verse – It's often that but sometimes it'll be paragraph by paragraph or taking a story as a whole and enjoying it - it depends what sort of text it is. And, as was pointed out to me the other day, verse-by-verse can be done in a non-expositional way - i.e. taking each verse one by one, treating it pretty much in isolation, using it as a launchpad or reading in whatever the preacher thinks and missing the big idea and flow of the passage and the book.
  5. Always sequential large chunks of a book – It will often be that (and there are a lot of advantages to sequential preaching) but there is still a place for one-off evangelistic sermons and topical sermons - they can be expository too - focussing on one text and letting it call people to Christ or speak to a particular issue.
  6. A Western thing or a new thing – This wasn't dreamt up in the US or UK 40 years ago. It was happening in Israel 2000 years ago (see Acts 2 or the book of Hebrews). Chrysostom was doing it in Turkey more than 1600 years ago.
  7. Just for ‘intellectuals’, educated people or literate people -  Duncan Forbes, who grew up on and leads a church on a tough council estate in London, gives a brilliant answer to this here. Also, one our apprentices pointed out the other day that topical sermons that jump all over the Bible - Leviticus, Matthew, Malachi, Acts - are actually far harder to follow and demand much more Biblical literacy than simply focussing on one Bible story or one passage and going through it - which even a small child can follow. And one other thing - expository preaching should be aimed at the heart.
  8. Boring – If it's boring then it's not expository preaching. God is not boring. The Bible is not boring. When it's opened up there should be a revelation of a glorious, awesome and constantly surprising God. So let's not talk about 'shining a light on the Bible text', or making the Bible 'come alive' - that's close to blasphemy - it is the living and active Word of God. 
  9. Spirit-quenching – You can't get more dramatically Spirit-filled than Acts 2. There's a tornado. They're speaking Chinese and Arabic. Their hair is on fire. Peter gets up on the podium and speaks without a PA system to thousands of people. And what comes out of his mouth? An expository sermon on Joel. It might not look like it but we've said before that expository preaching is actually Spirit-led preaching.
  10. Irrelevant - The fear is that if we stick to getting our message from the Bible then it will not be relevant to the hearers. We'll have to make it relevant in some clever way. Perhaps it's better just to think of a relevant topic (and what people need to hear on that) and then search the Bible for good quotes. But the Bible is relevant (2 Tim 3:16) because it's all about all about Jesus (2 Tim 3:15). And in fact it's full of topics - every book is a topic - they're just not quite the topics we might choose.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A prayer for the summer

LORD God, our God, the Maker of Heaven and Earth, our Father, as your children in the northern hemisphere enter this season of the academic year, please give us fresh grace to walk, stand and sit aright. May those of us who enjoy running and walking in your creation give thanks to you for that privilege but not be as concerned about the daily step count on our trackers as in taking practical steps this summer in kindness, in compassion, in forgiveness, in building others up, in pleasing the Lord - steps of progress in gracious, sacrificial, Christ-like loving (Ephesians 4-5).  May those of us who look forward to getting out of the city give thanks to you for the privilege of travel but not ultimately be as concerned about the physical location in which we stand (whether "beneath the boughs" or on a hot and sweaty tube train) as about our location "in Christ" - the address of every spiritual blessing, complete forgiveness, intimate sonship, total security (Ephesians ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Everlasting gobstopper theology

The idea here is that there are layers to Christ's fullness and when the biblical authors present Christ to us they might only explicitly refer to one layer but as they do that the underlying layers are also implied. Or to put it another way, the glory of the underlying layers shines through the layer that is presented to us. That might sound strange, abstract and not particularly helpful but let me try to explain.  The incarnation implies the pre-existent Word When John identifies "Jesus Christ has come in the flesh" as the key test of orthodoxy, Augustine asks (Homily 6 on 1 John) how can this be when so many heretics happily affirm the humanity of Jesus but deny his deity? Augustine then asks us to dig a bit deeper and consider: From whence did he come? "Was he not God?" Simon Gathercole demonstrated (in his 2006 book, The Pre-existent Son ) that Jesus' phrase in the synoptic gospels, "I have come", implies divine pre-existence.  So whenever we ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The virtue of stability

We live in a culture where stability, stick-ability and consistency are not really seen as virtues but disabilities. We told that it’s good to be flexible, agile, constantly shifting, morphing, evolving, jumping from one thing to another. Everyone offers us change – politicians, internet providers, management gurus. To stick with one thing, to be the same person yesterday, today and tomorrow is strange, boring, old-fashioned, impractical and probably deadly. Change becomes the new constant, flux and flex the new buzz words. That culture affects us personally and as churches. And there are some things about willingness to change (reformation?) that are hugely positive. We've talked about the need to be willing to change as a good farmer seeking growth . And how change is often spiritually good for us . But there are negative aspects to a culture that makes a virtue of constant instability. Is it good for customers and companies if employees change jobs every year? Is it good for chi...
Post a Comment
Read more