Skip to main content

Be blessed


In the Utumishi wa Neno course we want to think carefully about how we handle the Word. And where necessary we want to question, prayerfully, the way we commonly read and apply the Bible - especially the Old Testament.

What about the language of blessings and curses? The key texts – Lev. 26 & Deut. 28 – are so commonly quoted and alluded to you could say that they've got into our bloodstream. And they are really crucial passages to get our heads and hearts around. The historical and prophetic books of the Old Testament constantly refer back to these texts (e.g. the much-used Malachi 3). Blessings and curses are all over the Old Testament.

Here are a few quick thoughts and pointers:

  1. The blessings: Life, health,prosperity, agricultural abundance, respect, and safety.  The curses: Death, disease, drought, dearth, danger, destruction, defeat, deportation, destitution, and disgrace.  (Fee & Stuart)
  2. Corporate – They are addressed to ‘you’ plural not ‘you’ singular.  If the people of God as a whole obey/disobey then the whole people will be blessed/cursed.  As we see in the days of Elijah and Elisha there were godly individuals and a godly remnant who were affected by the curse of drought and famine along with the rest of Israel.
  3. Historical – As you read through the curses in Leviticus & Deuteronomy they start to sound more like prophecy of what will happen rather than an abstract threat.
  4. And of course they did all happen, even (horribly) down to women eating their children (2 Kings 6).
  5. Relational – The point of the blessings and curses was not the blessings and curses themselves.  The blessings were tokens of the LORD's love (see Lev. 26:11-12) and the curses were discipline designed to bring his people back to himself (see Lev. 26:23).
  6. Upped in the New Testament – We are in the New Covenant now – we don’t sacrifice bulls, we don’t go to a holy place, we don’t need priests.  There are still blessings and curses but they’ve been massively ratcheted up. Compare Deut. 29:20-21 with Rev. 22:18-19.  The blessing is now the joy of perfect fellowship with God in the New Creation (Rev. 21).  The curse is now the lake of fire (Rev. 20).  These are respectively far far better and far far worse than anything in Deuteronomy 28.
  7. Conditional - The key word in Deut. 28 and Lev. 26 is 'IF'. The blessings are for those who keep the covenant, obey God's voice, always walk in faithfulness. But none of has fulfilled the conditions. We are deceiving ourselves if we think we have. This is Law. It convicts us and condemns us.
  8. But the good news - Jesus has taken the curse of the Law on behalf of the believer (Gal. 3:10-14).  We still live in a fallen world where work, environment, health, our spirits groan under the weight of sin (Rom. 8).  We still await the wonderful day where there is no more curse (Rev. 22:3) but praise God that we are completely redeemed from the curse of the Law.  So let’s not threaten God’s people with old covenant curses or promise them old covenant blessings but instead preach Christ in whom we are (already) blessed with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly realm.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What to do with the Song of Songs?

There seem to be two extreme positions on interpreting the Song of Songs in our context – either it’s purely about Christ and the Church, or it is purely about human relationships. And the second of these seems to be much more common. And perhaps more common than either is a reluctance to even attempt to preach from the book. And then the other day I was reading a Christian book on marriage when the author suddenly felt the need to argue strongly at some length against the idea that the Song of Songs can be interpreted allegorically of Christ and the Church. So maybe it’s worth going through the key arguments the author made there against what is the traditional interpretation through church history that the Song is primarily to be taken as referring to the relationship between Christ and the Church. 1. The topic of the Song of Songs is obviously sex. Solomon is plainly writing about human, romantic relationships. That is his theme. Not Christ and the Church. In answer: That’s

Full/part-time paid/voluntary set-apart gospel ministry? Trying to find the best language for raising up the next generation of…

A lot of people recognise that Jesus’ words about the workers being few (Mark 9:37) are as true today as it was in the first century. I was recently standing in the garden of a friend, who’s the vicar of a rural parish, and he pointed north, south, east and west to neighbouring parishes where there were congregations without any meaningful pastoral oversight. And that’s just maintenance. If we’re talking about really getting into the unreached parts of the field and harvesting those outside the church then it’s going to need a lot more workers. If churches are going to be planted in significant numbers and at a significant pace across the UK then we’ll need hundreds more church planters in the next couple of decades. But as soon as we start talking about raising up workers for the harvest field we run into difficulties finding the most helpful language to use.       ‘Christian ministry’ or simply ‘the ministry’ has a long history of use as shorthand for ordained ministry but

When everything is just a bit rubbish

You know that experience of finding everything just slightly frustrated: The computer that you got two months ago starts crashing. There's a tiny leak slowly soaking the kitchen floor.  The car, which you haven't moved for a month, has a flat battery.  You put up a shelf and it's just slightly off horizontal. Only you will notice, or someone who looks very carefully, but you're annoyed that it is not right. You’ve proof read the manuscript twenty times but the moment you press send you realise there’s a typo on page one. A social media message misinterpreted opens a can of worms. The biscuits/cake/meal you’ve spent an hour preparing stays in the oven or on the stove just five minutes too long. It’s still edible but has that acrid taste round the edges. This is not real suffering. It's not  bereavement, pain, trauma. It's not a 14 hour shift in a PPE suit tending to the critically ill. It's not losing your job. It's not living under constan