Skip to main content

What Paul and Barnabas agreed on


The Book of Acts might well be a written for a church planter - so what is the end of chapter 15 (v36-41) teaching him as a church leader? 

Theophilus' eye will certainly be drawn first to the surprising disagreement between two church planting legends and he'd be given a reality check (and reassurance) that good, godly, well-motivated gospel workers will disagree and that is not terminal and God can use the conflict for good. In particular the incident raises the important issue of who do you take onto your team. Is it wise to take someone onto the launch team of a new church who has proved unreliable or experienced significant 'church hurt' or is in some way in bad relationship with their former church or has inflated expectations that 'this time it will be different'? Many would caution extreme care having seen the way church plants can be a magnet for those with conflicting agendas and unresolved grievances, only for patterns of disfunction to be repeated and what seemed a welcome juniper/myrtle addition to the team turns out to be a thorn and brier. At the very least, Acts 15:37-39 reminds us that difficult conversations need to be had around these issues.

But what was fresh for me looking at Acts 15:36-41 again was to notice three ways in which Paul and Barnabas are actually in complete agreement in this passage - all of which are important reminders for church planters in particular and gospel workers more generally:

They agree on a concern for outcomes
Both Paul and Barnabas want to go back to the churches where they preached the word of the Lord to check how they are doing (v36). Though they end up leaving in different directions, they both head off to places where they have preached and planted churches (v39, 41) to see what's there. The point is that they were not satisfied simply with 'preaching the word'. Yes that was their chief activity. That was their means of mission. That was what presented Jesus before the world and brought the dead to life. But their great concern was: "How are the believers doing right now? How is their faith? How are the elders (Acts 14:23)? How is their maturity? How are their numbers growing (Acts 14:1; 21)?" Paul and Barnabas are farmers who are desperately concerned for the harvest (2 Tim. 2:6; Romans 1:13 cf. Matt. 9:37; John 4:35). Yes they absolutely must plough and sow good seed but what they're really concerned about is the fruit. To use Andrew Heard's language - they are not satisfied only with godly inputs but they are desperately concerned about godly outcomes.   

They agree on the need for a team
They disagree on who should be on the team but agree that solo ministry is not an option. They are already Paul + Barnabas. By the end of the section there is Barnabas + Mark and Paul + Silas (soon to be Paul + Silas + Timothy + Luke). The picture of a church planter as a rugged (bearded) individual standing in a field on their own is totally unbiblical. We need to keep thinking team ministry. 

They agree on a willingness to risk 
They might order their values a little differently (reliability versus restoration) but both Barnabas and Paul are seeking to hold together wisdom and risk. They are not being recklessly thrill-seeking but neither are they being over-cautiously comfort-seeking (fear/complacency dressed up as prudence). Barnabas might appear to be heading to the safer option with John-Mark and admittedly it is home territory for him (Acts 4:36) but Cyprus is where there was incredibly intense spiritual warfare - sorcerers and curses and blindness (Acts 13:6-11) - which some commentators suggest was the cause of John-Mark jumping ship at the next port - so freaked out was he by what he'd witnessed. And now Barnabas is taking him back there! Interestingly church tradition suggests that Barnabas was eventually martyred on Cyprus. Paul, meanwhile heads north west towards the town where he was beaten almost to death (Acts 14:9; 16:1) and he soon winds up in distant Europe, in a Philippi prison (that Theophilus may know well). 

Let's pray for more fruit from our preaching of the word of Jesus, for ministry teams united in Jesus and for our willingness to risk for Jesus. 


More on Acts 15:36-41:
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

10 things servant leadership is

Having cleared away 10 things servant leadership is not , here are 10 that it is. [Credit to Harrison Mungai for his help in observing many of these features and helping us to think through this really important area.] I used to think that all that was necessary in gospel ministry was faithful Bible handling. Preach the Word carefully and surely everything else should follow? But I was wrong. Sadly it is possible to have high quality expository preaching and ungodly leadership. It shouldn’t be possible but it is. And it’s a very ugly thing. Peter Mead has written  on the danger that can be done to a church or ministry when appointment of leaders values ability over character. So here are ten aspects of biblical servant leadership, specifically in relation to gospel ministry leadership, from 1 Thessalonians, especially chapters 2 and 3: Servant leadership is, wherever possible, Plural . A lot of articles and books on leadership assume that it is a personal project. Search G...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utumishi wa Neno taster

It's finally starting! We had our first taster day for the church-based Utumishi wa Neno preaching course on Saturday. It was great to spend a few hours with 14 or so brothers and sisters and just spend soak in the Word. One of the crazy things we did was to read through the whole of Philippians out loud. How long did it take us? 15 minutes. And all of us enjoyed the experience and heard things we'd never noticed before. More thoughts on the day here . And for those who asked for the notes, they're available to download here . If you're in Kenya and want to get involved in the on-going Utumishi training see more info on the iServe Africa website .
5 comments
Read more

Too short a text?

I was a bit concerned recently when I found that a church I hugely respect had been going through the letter of 1 Peter for the last 7 months and were only just beginning chapter 5. It's wonderful to preach through the books and letters of the Bible. All that was said was true and helpful. But is there a danger in only taking three verses at a time? I think there is. You're likely to lose the flow of the letter. 1 Peter only takes 16 minutes (max) to read out loud. That is how the first readers would have heard it. That's how it's meant to be experienced. Certainly there's a place for more detailed study but there is a great danger we lose the flow, the themes, the life of this living letter. If you preach for 45 minutes on 3 verses you're likely to be bringing in all sorts of cross-references, lots of systematic theology. In fact the verses of 1 Peter itself are probably going to be only a small proportion of your content. So the great danger is that I...
1 comment
Read more