As Pentecost Sunday approaches I've been preparing to preach on Acts 2 and reading through the wider book. I was particularly struck by this verse:
And he said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” And they said, “No, we have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.” (Acts 19:2)
For a disciple not to have heard about the Holy Spirit seems to be Not A Good Thing.
For those of us who are concerned to emphasise (I think rightly) the priority of preaching Christ and him crucified and who see the Spirit’s role mainly as (to use J.I. Packer’s expression) a ‘spotlight ministry’, drawing the attention to Christ not himself, this stress on the Spirit in Acts is important to reckon with. Is there a danger that those of us who would think of ourselves as ‘conservative evangelicals’ might be so keen to distance ourselves from the excesses of hyper-Pentecostalism and unhelpful (or downright non-Christian) pneumatologies, that we might leave people with no doctrine of the Spirit at all? Where does the Holy Spirit fit into our Christian life, our proclamation, church planting and planning?
Acts 19:2 makes me think a number of things must have been true in the early church:
- Preaching the gospel usually included mention of the Holy Spirit and his work. Peter's speech in Acts 2 is a great example. The focus from beginning to end is on Christ but all the persons of the Trinity are mentioned: the exalted Christ has received his Father the Spirit to pour out (v33). (Today perhaps a gospel outline like 3-2-1 can be helpful in making sure we talk about the Trinity and Spirit early on and don’t leave them till later as an embarrassed bolt-on.)
- The invitation to receive Christ and to be baptised usually mentioned the Holy Spirit. Again, that’s what happens in Acts 2: baptism-forgiveness-Holy Spirit. As Jesus says, baptism is into the name (singular) of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19). When Paul reminds the Galatians of their conversion he appeals to them as ones who clearly knew that they had received the Spirit at that point (Gal. 3:2) – that was not debated – that was obviously what had happened – he wants to remind them how they received the Spirit – i.e. by hearing and believing the gospel of Christ crucified not by Law keeping. The Galatians knew their Christian life had begun by the power of God’s Spirit (Gal. 3:3), the question is whether they will go on that way.
- The early discipleship of believers would usually have been full of reminders of the gospel including explanation of the Spirit’s role in their salvation. You certainly see this throughout the apostles’ letters to the young churches. They are constantly reminding believers of what has happened to them so they grasp the enormity of it and live in accordance with it. Their focus is always on Christ and him crucified but wherever they talk about justification by faith and salvation through the blood of Christ, the Spirit is never far away. Ephesians 1: The Father chose you before Creation, the Son died for you on the Cross, the Spirit sealed you as you believed (cf. similarly 1 Peter 1:2). Titus 3:4-7: Father, Son and Spirit; justification and regeneration. Romans 8: stellar chapter interweaving the glorious gospel of Christ and the true work and marks of the Spirit.
***************
There are some good resources on this area:
- The classic is still J I Packer's Keep in Step with the Spirit. His Knowing God also has a fantastic chapter on Sonship and how that relates to the Spirit.
- More recently Orlando Saer has written Breath of Life - a Keep in Step for the twenty-first century.
- We had a very helpful sermon on Zechariah 4 at our church last Sunday making really clear the church's desperate need of the Spirit and the gracious promise of His equipping.
Comments
Post a Comment