Skip to main content

9 marks of the 18th century revival

One of my very favourite books is J.C. Ryle’s, Christian Leaders of the 18th Century (originally published in the 19th century as Christian Leaders of the Last Century).  It might sound a bit dull, dry and dusty but if you've read it you'll know it is gripping, inspiring, fantastically relevant stuff.  It’s basically the story of the English and Welsh revivals of the mid 18th century told mainly through brief biographies of 11 men who were greatly used by God to bring thousands to Christ and turn around their church and nation.  You can freely and legally download or read online the whole book here.
It's always risky to try to crystalise out the key ingredients of a move of God but Ryle attempts it himself in his last chapter and it can be a useful thing - at least to compare with our current context and practice. So here are 9 marks of the revival that come out of Ryle's narrative:
  1. The terrible state of society and church before the revival - if we ever lose hope for our day you just have to look at the state of England before the 18th century revival – Christianity was all but dead, a gospel-less moralism was preached from the pulpit while the same morality ‘was thoroughly trampled under foot in the streets’ (p. 14), fighting, sexual immorality, gambling, swearing and drunkenness ‘were hardly recognised as vices at all – they were the fashionable practices of people in the highest ranks of society’ (p. 18), the country was completely undeveloped, uneducated and had no influence in the world.
  2. The primacy of preaching – the instrument of conversion of individuals and of the transformation of society was the preaching of the gospel. The leaders of the revival were generous and compassionate men but they were men of one thing: preaching Christ crucified. Their focus was on eternal things rather than on social transformation – social action did not precede the message or always accompany the message but a massive outpouring of social transformation followed their preaching (education, workers rights, protection for children, abolition of slavery, animal welfare, economic development).
  3. The purity of the gospel – their preaching was gospel preaching – both to the unconverted and the converted – and their gospel was very clear and sharply focussed – it was all about Jesus, all about his righteousness, his death as the only and sufficient sacrifice for sins, they were always talking about your heart, your sin, repentance, the need to be born again, the joy of knowing Christ.
  4. The straightforwardness and earnestness of their preaching – this is something that really hit me – they crucified their style and spoke as plainly as possible straight to the heart of their listener with great love and authority and humility and pleading and an uncontainable passion for Christ.
  5. Un-strategic places became strategic – one or two of them were based in London for a time, a few of them ranged very widely over the UK as itinerant evangelists for much of their ministry but the majority laboured away based in one place – not a city or even a major market town but an apparently un-strategic place that became a beacon of gospel life and hope for miles around.
  6. Many of these leaders were converted in their thirties – often while already in ordained ministry (!) – which shows that while the ‘4/14 window’ is very important, God can do powerful miracles of conversion in later life and the effects can be even more dramatic.
  7. Almost all of them were university graduates - they came often from humble backgrounds, worked extremely hard at their university studies, learnt Hebrew and Greek, never flaunted their knowledge in the pulpit but no-one could accuse them of being stupid or ignorant. 
  8. They pursued Christian unity – they were all Anglican but many were rejected by the authorities in the Church of England. They were far less concerned about their denomination than the Church of Christ. With one exception they all ran after peace with their brothers every bit as hard as they fought for the truth and related with great love and generosity and humility towards those they disagreed with.
  9. They died well – of the twenty to forty pages Ryle gives to each leader, three to six pages are devoted to the final 24 or 48 hours of their life - several of these accounts made me cry – this is when their gospel convictions really pass the test, as they stick to the sufficiency of Christ alone to the very last, as they pass into the eternity and joy that they preached and go to the Lord they lived for and had completely cast themselves on.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Everlasting gobstopper theology

The idea here is that there are layers to Christ's fullness and when the biblical authors present Christ to us they might only explicitly refer to one layer but as they do that the underlying layers are also implied. Or to put it another way, the glory of the underlying layers shines through the layer that is presented to us. That might sound strange, abstract and not particularly helpful but let me try to explain.  The incarnation implies the pre-existent Word When John identifies "Jesus Christ has come in the flesh" as the key test of orthodoxy, Augustine asks (Homily 6 on 1 John) how can this be when so many heretics happily affirm the humanity of Jesus but deny his deity? Augustine then asks us to dig a bit deeper and consider: From whence did he come? "Was he not God?" Simon Gathercole demonstrated (in his 2006 book, The Pre-existent Son ) that Jesus' phrase in the synoptic gospels, "I have come", implies divine pre-existence.  So whenever we ...

Building a RAFT: transitioning well

From the archives - originally written 8 years ago in the midst of international family transition… When Duncan Olumbe led an excellent session for the iServe Africa ministry training course on transition , there was one thing that he mentioned but didn’t have time to go into detail on: building a RAFT. The idea of building a RAFT comes from Pollock & Van Reken's  Third Culture Kids: Growing Up Among Worlds but it’s applicable to anyone moving on, whether adults or children, expats or citizens. The basic plan is Reconciliation-Affirmation-Farewells-ThinkDestination. It’s not only practical and proven but it also fits well with the pattern and teaching of the apostle Paul, someone who certainly knew what it was to go through a lot of transitions. Reconciliation Deal with conflict before you leave. Forgive and ask for forgiveness. We can easily sweep conflict under the carpet. Particularly when we are leaving it’s very tempting not to bother dealing with unresolved issues. But...

10 things servant leadership is

Having cleared away 10 things servant leadership is not , here are 10 that it is. [Credit to Harrison Mungai for his help in observing many of these features and helping us to think through this really important area.] I used to think that all that was necessary in gospel ministry was faithful Bible handling. Preach the Word carefully and surely everything else should follow? But I was wrong. Sadly it is possible to have high quality expository preaching and ungodly leadership. It shouldn’t be possible but it is. And it’s a very ugly thing. Peter Mead has written  on the danger that can be done to a church or ministry when appointment of leaders values ability over character. So here are ten aspects of biblical servant leadership, specifically in relation to gospel ministry leadership, from 1 Thessalonians, especially chapters 2 and 3: Servant leadership is, wherever possible, Plural . A lot of articles and books on leadership assume that it is a personal project. Search G...